Where I Consider My Need for Wheel #2…

I mentioned a few weeks ago that I had purchased an Ashford Traveller as my first spinning wheel.  I love it and I think I am doing pretty well for a beginner, but…

Here is my problem:  I think in order to do the plying I want to do, I will need to buy the Jumbo flyer unit which will cost about $140.00.  I also want to do some thinner lace-weight yarn so it appears I would need to purchase the high speed flyer ($80) or the lace flyer ($200) (I’m confused about the difference).  And, of course, I’ll probably need to get extra bobbins as well ($10-$13 per).

Add that to the $450 the wheel cost and the $75 I spent on the new sliding hook flyer and it brings my investment to about $750-$850 plus  whatever the bobbin amount ends up being.  If I want the sliding hook flyer for the jumbo, that’s more still.

Additionally, I imagine that constantly changing the flyer unit (which includes reinserting a screw for the upright into the wood, will, at some point cause the a problem.   How many times can you screw into wood before it just doesn’t hold anymore?  That would mean replacement uprights…and on it goes.

So, my question is this:  Is it more practical to purchase a second wheel and keep the Traveller for a specific purpose, say, plying.  If so, what’s a wheel that is equipped to spin the kind of yarn I want without modifying the wheel?  I have been looking at the Schacht Matchless.  Will that spin the type of yarn I want?  One of the reason I liked the Ashford was because, with the lace flyer, you can achieve a ratio of 40:1, which is very fast indeed.  The Matchless has a maximum ratio of 22:1 or 27:1 (depending on which you believe).  That’s a big difference.  Does it translate to a big difference in the thickness/thinness of yarn?

I would hate to sink another $200-$300 in the Traveller now, and then find I need even more accessories.

What do you think?  I really need the advice of experienced spinners.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Enter the code that you see in the image